Havering (Parliament Politics Magazine) – Plans to demolish buildings in Rainham, Havering, for new flats and shop space were rejected, with officials calling the project “materially harmful” to the area.
“The demolition of existing buildings and construction of Class A1 Unit of ground floor, flats on first and second floor with associated parking and servicing arrangements” was the subject of a June planning application filed to Havering Council.
According to the plan submitted by applicant Mr. M. Choda, 147 Rainham Road is the potential location for the project.
A one-story commercial building and a two-story property behind it are among the structures on the current site, per the documentation that go with the designs.
“Accommodation” would be offered in the roof area of the new building to the front of the property, according to a design and access statement that Stephensons prepared on behalf of Mr. Choda.
One three-bedroom, five-person apartment was suggested for the second floor of the projected rear building, while four one-bedroom apartments would have been constructed on the first floor if allowed.
On September 30, the Havering Council reaffirmed its decision to reject the plans for a variety of reasons.
Among these were worries that the development would be “materially harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area” and appear “unduly dominant and visually intrusive” from the street.
Additionally, the planning committee asserted that the proposal will lead to “poor quality” housing and living conditions.
What legal grounds were cited for calling the plans materially harmful?
Development that results in negative impact on the character, visual appearance and amenity of the area, whether through loss of green space, increased overshadowing or other unacceptable changes inconsistent with the design guide for the area.
Threats to Special Protection Areas, Sites of Special Scientific Interest and other protected animals, habitats and green infrastructure. Increased traffic, noise or pollution that materially and significantly affects the quality of life of local residents.
There may also be good grounds to contravene the development plan in a “material consideration” meaning the development does not conform substantially with the LPA framework or local policy to protect character or the environment.
