Why does the British monarchy still exist? Tradition, power, and public support

Why does the British monarchy still exist Tradition and Power
Credit: DARREN STAPLES/Pool via REUTERS

It has proved to be a complex mixture of power, visibility, cultural icon status, constitutional position, and a history of stability that has allowed the British monarchy to survive to this date. Nonetheless, the monarchy has a place in British politics and the national identity of the United Kingdom, despite the appearance of republican energetic feeling and a discussion of whether it is vital and expensive. With a history spanning over a millennium, the British monarchy is among the oldest regimes known to exist. The culture and national affinity are very strong due to this historical past. Lots of individuals take into consideration the monarchy as a stabilizing force against social change since it is the physical connection to the preceding past of the nation, a representation of centuries of ceremony, custom, and continuity. 

British monarch history

The historical significance and continuity is one of the prime reasons why the British monarchy has managed to last to date. Its custom dates back over a millennium, and it is amongst the oldest hereditary institutions globally. England has a prolonged history of Anglo-Saxon and the medieval Scottish line of kings, up until it came under union with England in 1066, the monarchy as we recognize it was officially initiated with the Norman Conquest in 1066.

Along with immense political and social turmoil, including civil wars, religious reformations, and regime changes, the monarchy has enjoyed a long succession of several centuries that have related the contemporary reigns to centuries of British history, tradition, and identity.

The crucial historical epochs include:

  • The Conquest (1066) brought the centralized monarchy.
  • Magna Carta (1215) provided the first limitation of the monarch’s authority with the help of laws.
  • When James VI of Scotland became James I of England in the Union of the Crowns (1603), the result was that such a single monarch was created, but there remained separate kingdoms. 
  • The evolution of the given forms in the 18th and 19th centuries resulted in the fact that the constitutional monarch became mostly ceremonial in its authority, and the actual political life passed to the Parliament and the government selected by the people.

The modern House of Windsor dates back to the early twentieth century, when Queen Elizabeth II reigned for 70 years, being succeeded on the throne in 2022 by King Charles III.

During these periods, there has been the presence of a constant constitutional and symbolic monarchy. The perpetuity of this chain symbolizing the existence of the country in terms of historical and political stability links the past with the present. It has survived as a national symbol and unifier due to its ability to survive all of the changes in circumstance and modify itself to the loss of great government power, and remain a part of the ceremony.

Constitutional role and political stability

The political stability that the British monarchy provides and its constitutional role are some of the major factors why it still exists. The Head of State is the monarch of the United Kingdom, currently King Charles III. Not only does he have powers that are bound by well-established constitutional conventions, but he can also be bound by statute law. The important points connected with this constitutional stand and their role in maintaining political stability are the following:

Non-partisan and ceremonial head of state: It is the head of the monarch of politically diverse countries, therefore acting as a unifying force, but mainly in ceremonial and symbolic duties that are employed to stay above the party lines. The king illustrates national sovereignty and carries out the roles in the country, like the State Opening of Parliament and Royal Assent, which is the formality that transforms the bills into a law.

Royal prerogative and executive power: The prerogative powers of the monarch to appoint the prime minister, dissolve Parliament, issue passports, declare war, and exercise other executive functions are now simply used under the advice and mandate of democratically elected government ministers, most notably the prime minister. This ensures that the king does not operate in isolation and ensures democracy.

Appointment of the prime minister: The incumbent head of the majority party in the House of Commons is asked by the monarch to form a government after a general election. Such a role prevents a constitutional vacuum, political crisis, and a smooth constitutional transfer of power.

Parliamentary roles: To allow governance to take place through the formal constitutional procedure, the sovereign opens and closes Parliament and reads the Queen’s (now King’s) Speech, which lists the governmental legislative program.

Guarding of continuity of the constitution: Whenever a monarch dies or abdicates, the monarchy selects the next ruler who will succeed automatically and without any opposition, so that confusion or a power vacuum does not arise. It is a weekly informal meeting between the prime minister and the king that gives direction and, in the process, supports and offers caution without any political coercion, as well as ensuring continuity of governance. 

The denomination of the monarch is recognized as the symbol of the state power in the uncodified constitution of the United Kingdom. The usages of royal prerogative are not above the courts and rulings that have already been shown in the case of the proroguing of parliament have jurisdiction to test it by having a legitimacy, and the royal power is subject to the law, parliamentary supervision, and constitutional practices.

A representation of unity and national identity

The king or queen of Britain is the center of pride, unity, and nationality. The monarchy represents British history, culture, beliefs, and traditions to most people. It aids in establishing a shared Britishness that pays no heed to social, political, and geographical differences. National celebrations like royal weddings, royal coronations, and royal jubilees provide possibilities for celebration and common ground in reminiscing about the nation’s history. This cultural element is also supported by the reality that the monarchy must be observable in mundane items such as money, postal stamps, and government buildings. Also, in this increasingly changing world, it offers stability and continuity, and encourages volunteerism and community spirit.

Soft power and international diplomacy

Another important feature of the UK’s global impact is the role of the monarchy in soft power and international relations that complement the traditional governmental diplomacy without the use of economic and military might. This kind of soft power allows the monarchy to sustain diplomatic relationships and arouse goodwill with multinationals through ceremonial visits and cultural participation.

Key aspects of the British monarchy in terms of its application of diplomacy and soft power are as follows:

Apolitical and symbolic diplomacy: In the global perspective, the monarchy acts as a neutral and unifying tool since it is above the intrapolitics section of the nation. Monarchs and senior royals often invite foreign statesmen on a state visit and reception in a manner that is not routinely achieved by elected politicians due to political restraints and the domination of results such as the enhanced image of the UK, confidence-building, and opening lines of the political pathway.

As diplomatic gestures: The travels of the kings (including King Charles III) and other royal family members usually have a major diplomatic message attached. For instance, Prince William travelled to Estonia as a representation of the UK’s commitment to NATO and the UK being a bulwark against a Russian invasion when he travelled in uniform to Estonia, bordering Russia. These travels also demonstrate solidarity, showing others and reinforcing the UK’s position on security issues. 

National branding and cultural diplomacy: By promoting British history, culture, and values from a global viewpoint, the British monarchy is drawing visitors from all over the world and enhancing national identity. These include entertaining in cultural exchanges and hosting and meeting world leaders. The monarchy, in this regard, is perceived as a significant national asset that can influence foreign publics in a positive way as well as communicate to the worldwide audience.

Partnership between government and soft power council: The UK government has institutionalized efforts to utilize soft power by forming bodies like the newly formed Soft Power Council in recognition of the fact that this is crucial to its international influence. The monarchy is a very prominent element of this greater scheme of using soft power, merging diplomacy, education, sports, and culture together to advance national foreign policy agendas.

Diplomatic role of King Charles III: Despite his health complications, King Charles III has evolved to be a soft power figure to develop foreign contacts under respectful public diplomacy. His effort to support relations between the UK and the Commonwealth and other issues, such as supporting Ukraine, shows that the monarchy still plays a continuous role on the international stage.

Popularity and public support

Even though the level of this support is relative, the general opinion polls indicate that the majority of Britons are in favor of retaining the monarchy, despite being heavily criticized for the removal call by some. Although most people do not care or even believe that it is related to politics, most of them hold its practices and ceremonial role. This patronage is reinforced by royal family appearances, patronages, and charitable activities. Travels and other economic benefits that contribute to the improvement of the British economy are also triggered by the interests of the people in the actions of the Royals.

Problems and critiques

Skeptics argue that the monarchy remains an outdated and feudalistic system that is opposed to social equality and democratic processes. They claim that the inherited position of the head of state is undemocratic and costly to taxpayers. Even though the monarchy does not hold much political power, it is practiced by the ministers and is grounded on royal prerogative, which is considered, according to some people, unaccountable and not transparent. The scandals, conflicts, and imperial history have also questioned the legitimacy and the significance of the monarchy. This has been one of the ongoing problems, and this has resulted in the emergence of Republican sentiment, especially among the younger generation.