UK (Parliament Politic Magazine) – Palestinian rights organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) have strongly criticized the recent passing of a bill by the UK Parliament. This bill aims to curtail the influence of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement within Britain. After extensive deliberation, the House of Commons overwhelmingly supported the Economic Activity of Public Bodies (Overseas Matters) Bill on Monday night. Around 268 votes were in favor and 70 against. However, this decision has faced significant backlash from various Palestinian rights organizations and NGOs. These organizations argue that the bill’s passage undermines the fundamental principles of freedom of expression and peaceful protest.
Controversial UK Bill Raises Concerns about Israel’s Accountability
The proposed legislation allows for the imposition of fines on public entities in the United Kingdom that initiate boycotts or actively campaign against a specific territory unless it aligns with the government’s foreign policy. However, these new regulations are widely perceived as specifically targeting the pro-Palestinian Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which has garnered support from various prominent councils across Britain.
Michael Gove, the Secretary of State for Communities, has emphasized that the bill aims to maintain the responsibility of the UK government in shaping foreign policy, rather than delegating it to smaller public entities. Gove argues that the BDS movement, which advocates for economic pressure on Israel due to its treatment of Palestinians in the Occupied Territories, has led to a surge in incidents of anti-Semitism.
However, Chris Doyle, the director of the Council for Arab-British Understanding, expressed his concerns to Arab News regarding the “dreadful” legislation proposal. He believes that if implemented, it would severely limit local democracy in the UK and hinder public bodies from exercising due diligence. He argued that the bill constitutes a significant limitation on the freedom of speech and conscience, and would ultimately prove ineffective in its aim to combat antisemitism.
Analyzing the Impact of UKs Anti-BDS Bill on Israel’s Image
Chris Doyle asserts that the proposed legislation would not only contradict the UK’s established legal positions regarding Israel and the Occupied Territories but also provide the former with a “protective shield” for its transgressions. The UK has maintained a longstanding foreign policy towards Israel, advocating for the cessation of the military occupation of Palestinian territories through the implementation of a two-state solution.
As a fundamental aspect of this position, the expansion of Israeli settlements in the Occupied Territories is considered an unlawful impediment to peace according to international law. Chris Doyle cautioned that if the bill were to be adopted as UK policy, Israel would stand as the sole nation globally from which a local British public entity would be prohibited to divest.
Peter Leary, the campaigns officer at the Palestine Solidarity Campaign, expressed his concern to Arab News regarding the current situation. He highlighted that Israel is currently engaging in unprecedented levels of violence against the Palestinian people. Despite this, the British government has specifically targeted Israel in the anti-boycott bill, along with the ‘occupied Palestinian territories’ and ‘occupied Golan Heights’. These territories are explicitly safeguarded by the law, preventing any public sector boycotts.
Read More: UK Parliament Attempts to Shut Down Israel Debate
Critics Question UKs Anti-BDS Bill, Claiming Bias in Favor of Israel
Despite assertions that foreign policy remains unchanged, a significant shift has occurred with the introduction of new British legislation. This legislation marks the first time that Israel and the territories it illegally occupies will be treated equally, deviating from the long-standing international consensus on the illegality of settlements.
Furthermore, the bill has faced criticism from Members of Parliament, including Alicia Kearns, a prominent figure within the governing Conservative Party. Kearns, who holds the position of Chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, has expressed her concerns regarding the legislation. She suggested that the government should eliminate any mentions of Israel and Palestine from the text of the legislation, as it effectively grants Israel exceptional impunity.”
A spokesperson from the UK government responded, stating, “Public bodies should not be pursuing their foreign policy agenda … The ban on boycotts does not apply to individuals, including publicly elected officials when carrying out private acts that are protected by the Human Rights Act.” This bill shamelessly advocates for the evasion of accountability when it comes to violations of international law and the deeply entrenched discrimination that Palestinians endure.